How can gps be used for fitness

Any questions, please ask or search for your answer. To keep up with the latest in sport science and this website, subscribe to our newsletter.

We are also on facebook and twitter. Any comments, suggestions or corrections? Please let us know. Going into more depth than just looking at distance and speed, global positioning systems have also been applied to detect fatigue in matches, identify periods of most intense play, different activity profiles by position, competition level, and sport.

More recent research has integrated GPS data with the physical capacity or fitness test score of athletes, game-specific tasks, or tactical or strategic information. Other performance factors like the force of hits a player suffers, fatigue over a period of time, strength and conditioning results can suddenly be quantified.

And within all this data is the means to possibly prevent, or at least delay, player injuries in the future. Along with these performance factors, there is also the idea that the GPS can be used for health benefits for the players. In this respect, the GPS technology can benefit player welfare.

During that year, Manchester United had the lowest injury rates in the English Premier league. Your Email Address. Send Email. Quantifying Game Demands: Football In contact sports like football, coaches using GPS can read real-time tackle and impact information instead of, or in addition to, time-consuming video analysis.

Click To Tweet GPS can also track game fatigue by showing the difference between the highest running intensities during first and last fifteen minutes of the game.

Court-Based Sports GPS technology has yet to be refined for court-based sports requiring rapid but confined movement patterns and continuous direction changes like tennis and basketball. References Aughey, R. Cummins, C. Orr, H. West Dellaserra, C. Gao, and L. Ransdell Duffield, R. Reid, J. Baker, and W. In the sessions where she has brought along an iPhone which has a GPS chip and used Runkeeper to track her run, while also letting the Fitbit track the workout, the results have varied notably.

Her splits, or individual times per mile, can be a minute or more apart according to the two devices. In our testing, both trackers regularly took a minute or more to acquire a GPS signal, whereas our running-watch pick took just a few seconds.

Making matters worse, the Gear Fit2 lost GPS connectivity and did not offer any indication of that while we were running. We lost data on a few workouts as a result. Why not a smartwatch? Otherwise, tracking your run with just a smartwatch is better suited for people running for fitness, not pace.

Still, with these you face the most common exercise challenge: sweat. The devices themselves are usually waterproof, but the bands you wear for daily fashion might not be.

You either swap out bands every time you want to exercise, wear a rubberized, sweat-resistant band at all times, or destroy your leather and metal bands, one after another.